Thursday, April 17, 2014

Bigger Vs. Smaller Government, and Jesus


          There has been an ongoing debate for a long, long time about whether government should be bigger or smaller.  The debates have raged, but it is hard to discount success and it is hard to hide failure.  Over the course of the last 80 years there have been times government was shrank, but the majority of the time government has expanded – sometimes quite rapidly.  Most notably among the leaps were Franklin Roosevelt’s “New Deal,” and Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society.”

            Many have come to view “Obamacare” as the sort of “trifecta” which basically completes the government’s responsibilities by assuming the role of providing healthcare for all Americans.  Many view this as nothing short of Socialism.  Others would not go that far, but would concede that it is a move in a more “socialistic” direction.  The dictionary definition of “Socialism” is “A way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies.” (Webster’s)  Many believe the ultimate goal of Obamacare is to force a collapse of the private insurance market and force the country into a single payer system; i.e. a government monopoly on healthcare.

          Conservatives have generally advocated smaller government, lower taxes, tax breaks for business owners and corporations with a view toward stimulating the economy and thereby encouraging economic growth, self-reliance, and individualism.  Traditionally liberals have supported growth of government and government programs, higher taxes to support this growth and advocate that people, particularly wealthier Americans, should pay more in order to subsidize the poorer and weaker.  Liberals have cited, as precedent, everything from the more socialistic leaning European countries to the Bible in defense of their position.  Conservatives, in contrast, have sought to pound home the idea that man should be as free as possible and that government is controlled by “We the People” (U.S. Constitution Preamble) and not the other way around.

          Some have pointed to Scriptures such as Acts 2:44-45 where the early church is said to have “had all things in common;” or perhaps to Jesus’ examples of caring for the poor and less fortunate in order to defend their positions.  Certainly, these are noble and indeed expected of followers of Christ.  But the question becomes; ‘Did Jesus admonish individuals or governments to care for others?’  Jesus had strikingly little to say about governments and politics.  When he taught that mankind was to “Render to Caesar what is Caesar’s and unto God what is God’s” (Mat. 22:21) he was effectively highlighting an eternal separation of the institution of man/government with the Kingdom of God.  Empires, countries, and even their forms of government have come and gone over time and will continue to come and go as long as the earth remains, but the Kingdom of God is ultimately “a-political,” or separate from politics, even though many have tried to intertwine the two is unhealthy ways.  

          President Obama and the late President Reagan could hardly have two more divergent viewpoints concerning foreign policy, economic philosophy, and the role of government.  This year, 2014, marks the 25th anniversary of President Reagan’s farewell address to the nation given from the Oval Office on January 11, 1989.  I strongly encourage you to follow the link below and listen to the 20 minute address by the former President, paying careful attention to his philosophy and considering its results after implementation during his 8 years in office.  Especially compared with what we are seeing and hearing today from various voices in the debate.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKVsq2daR8Q

          President Reagan says in this address that “government is the car, and ‘We the People’ are the drivers.” He believed Americans are to control when it goes, when it stops, how fast it goes, and where it goes.  But, far more prevalent in the current administration are initiatives and policies in support of the premise that “We the People” are the car and government is the driver with government effectively controlling when, where, and how we go.  The two philosophies are totally different and stand in total contrast to one another.

          Considering our responsibilities as Christians some may ask, “How would Jesus view these things?”  There were plenty of attempts to pull Jesus down into the petty arguments of the day.  Many of the questions he was asked were nothing more than traps set by those who sought to eliminate his credibility.  He never fell for it.  His answers strongly implied that the answers to their questions were largely unimportant in the bigger scheme of things.  But, are these questions totally unimportant for us?  Is there a preferred way; a more biblical approach?  I believe there is.  We certainly need to determine as much as we can about the issue(s). 

          One of my favorite Christian philosophers is the late Ronald Nash.  I have about 20 titles in my library authored by him.  A couple of his books are quite helpful at this point.  One is entitled Poverty and Wealth: The Christian Debate over Capitalism. This book introduces the study of economics and observes basic economic principles as they are played out in world history. The other is Social Justice and the Christian Church.  This book strongly refutes those who would capture evangelical Christianity for leftist causes.  Nash insists that Socialism caricatures capitalism and disadvantages more than it helps the needy.  It tends to create a sense of dependency in place of self-reliance which is unhealthy and demeaning to both individuals and entire societies.  It is the old principle at work that if you give a man a fish, you feed him for a day, but if you teach a man to fish, you feed him for a lifetime.

          This issue is no different than any other.  Christians need to increase their knowledge and be able to argue their positions credibly, intelligibly, and biblically.  When people mischaracterize and misrepresent Scripture we need to be able to recognize it and rebut with cogent arguments always in defense of God’s Word. 

In Christ,

Dr. Allen Raynor, Pastor